An article about proposed changes in the marijuana laws in Wisconsin makes it seems like Madison is the only city taking measures into their own hands since 1977. Many municipalities have lowered fines and decriminalized marijuana for decades also. It is the state that is so far behind! A few years back the the Cities of Monona and Sturgeon Bay both have also removed the penalty for possession of marijuana in private residences. Similar efforts have also been discussed in Berlin and Appleton.
Although the City of Madison seems to be cool with weed, this article touches on the struggles the city has in reforming marijuana laws, the struggles any city in Wisconsin will have reforming marijuana laws. What will this change in the law lead to? In Michigan, the subject of “marijuana lounges”, “marijuana clubs” and marijuana events are still hot topics locally and at the state level.
If Wisconsin does not move forward soon, the cities that have decriminalized marijuana locally will be soon to follow Madison, Monona and Sturgeon Bay and just remove the penalty all together!
Sign the petition at the end of the article to help make marijuana reform a priority in 2021! Follow along on our campaign Facebook Page Decriminalize Wisconsin.
Here is the article:
It may soon be OK to fire up a joint or carry under an ounce of marijuana outside in Madison.
Currently, a Madison ordinance from 1977 allows people to consume or possess cannabis in private, or in public with a prescription — even though consumption and possession for non-medical uses are against state law.
Now, Downtown Ald. Mike Verveer, 4th District, who has long been an advocate of decriminalizing marijuana, and at least 11 other council members have introduced three ordinances to update the city’s cannabis laws that would:
- Permit individuals 18 and older to consume or possess up to 28 grams — slightly less than an ounce — of cannabis or cannabis derivatives on private or public property with permission of the owner, landlord or tenant.
- Allow possession of drug paraphernalia for cannabis use.
- Ban consumption in a motor vehicle while in operation, on school property, within 1,000 feet of any school or on school buses.
- Prohibit smoking cannabis in any place where smoking of cigarettes and other tobacco products and devices are prohibited.
The proposals continue to permit consumption or possession of cannabis or cannabis derivatives if the person has a prescription, which reflects state law.
“Possession of cannabis on private property has been legal in Madison since 1977 but has always been illegal under state and federal laws,” assistant city attorney Marci Paulsen said. “The proposed ordinance extends the legal possession and consumption in the city onto some public property. Throughout the nation, jurisdictions have begun to legalize the possession of cannabis despite possession continuing to be illegal under federal law. What is occurring in Madison mirrors this trend.”
Enforcement of the related laws is handled on the local level, said Gillian Drummond, spokeswoman for the state Department of Justice. She referred questions to Dane County District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, who could not be reached.
“Madison had been known for decades for its progressive cannabis regulations. As time has gone on, Madison is no longer seen as progressive,” Verveer said, noting that neighboring states have legalized marijuana and the city of Eau Claire reduced its municipal possession fine to $1. “It’s something that’s long overdue.”
In November 2018, 76% of Dane County voters supported a nonbinding referendum to legalize recreational use of cannabis, Verveer said.
The proposals also seek to address significant racial disparities in how local laws have been enforced, Verveer said, adding that a 20-year Madison police study of 6,875 cannabis citations found 51% went to whites and 43.4% to blacks, even though blacks make up just 7% of the city’s population.
Acting Police Chief Vic Wahl said enforcement related to marijuana is generally focused on high-level trafficking and much less on small quantities or personal use, but sometimes marijuana possession can be associated with other criminal activity or problematic behavior and result in enforcement.
“Generally, it seems better to have decisions on marijuana decriminalization happen at the state level,” he said. “Changing the ordinance can create confusion. It also removes the option for officers to issue a municipal citation rather than proceed with a criminal charge when action is needed.”
Essentially, the ordinances would let someone consume outdoors at someone’s house or other private property including a tavern, restaurant or other business with the owner’s permission, and outdoors on public property is permitted, Paulsen said. The proposals would not allow use in city parks, for example, because under current park rules no one is allowed to possess controlled substances, she said.
Under the proposals, Madison police would not be allowed to refer cannabis cases for prosecution if they involve less than 28 grams unless the case involves violations of other provisions such as the ban against using marijuana while driving or near a school, Paulsen said. The police could still send cases to the Dane County district attorney when they involve other offenses, but they can’t write local tickets if possession or consumption is allowed under the proposed ordinances, she said.
Wahl said he’d prefer cannabis laws be consistent with alcohol laws and apply only to those 21 and older, and exempt areas where the community probably does not want marijuana such as parks, public pools and drug- and alcohol-treatment facilities. Vehicles and traffic safety are also a concern, he said, noting that the proposals only prohibit consuming marijuana in a vehicle if it is operating.
Nothing in city liquor licenses prevents taverns from allowing outdoor cannabis consumption on their properties unless the city’s Alcohol License Review Committee or City Council put specific conditions on licenses, assistant city attorney Jennifer Zilavy said.
State statutes lists grounds for revocation or suspension of a liquor licenses, and two of those relate to delivery or distribution of controlled substances including THC, including knowingly allowing another person who is on the premises to possess with intent to sell, Zilavy said.
“The question would be whether the actions of the individual constitute delivery or distribution,” she said. “For example, if a customer brings their bag of weed and offers it to another in exchange for money or a drink, that could be considered delivery/distribution.”
here may be a need to follow up with some zoning code changes, Verveer said.
Currently, Madison citations cost $50 plus costs for a total $124. Under the proposals, the cost would drop to $1 plus costs, or $62.26.
The changes would likely result in fewer cannabis-related citations, a fiscal note from the city Finance Department says. From Jan. 1, 2019, through Aug. 1, 2020, 468 cannabis citations were issued representing about $54,000 in fines, of which $14,000 has been paid, the note says.
The legislation was introduced to the council on Tuesday night and will be referred to city committees for review before coming back to the full council for a vote. With 12 sponsors, the legislation already has enough support to pass the 20-member council.
Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway could not be reached.
The ordinances are sponsored by Alds. Verveer, Max Prestigiacomo, Zachary Henak, Shiva Bidar, Marsha Rummel, Michael Tierney, Grant Foster, Patrick Heck, Rebecca Kemble, Tag Evers, Sheri Carter and Keith Furman.