Members of the US Senate Appropriations Committee voted 16 to 14 late last week in favor of an amendment to allow state-compliant marijuana businesses to engage in relationships with financial institutions.
Sponsored by Senators Jeff Merkley (D) of Oregon and Patty Murray (D) of Washington, the amendment to the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill prohibits the US Treasury Department from using federal funds to take punitive actions against banks that provide services to marijuana-related businesses that are operating legally under state laws.
The vote marks the first time that members of the US Congress have decided in favor of amending federal law to permit marijuana-related business access to banks and other financial institutions.
Commenting on the vote, NORML’s Political Director Danielle Keane said: “No industry can operate safely, transparently or effectively without access to banks or other financial institutions. It is time for Congress to change federal policy so that this growing number of state-compliant businesses, and their consumers, may operate in a manner that is similar to other legal commercial entities.”
Related legislation, The Marijuana Businesses Access to Banking Act of 2015, is also pending before lawmakers in the United States House and Senate.
For more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre, NORML Executive Director, at (202) 483-5500 or Danielle Keane, NORML Political Director, at: danielle@norml.org.
States that have legalized medical marijuana could soon get an unwanted visit from the DEA. Yesterday, Congress stunned the cannabis industry by rejecting the only legal protection preventing Attorney General Jeff “good people don’t smoke marijuana” Sessions from cracking down on those 30 states for violating federal cannabis prohibition.
Back in 2014, lawmakers passed an amendment to the federal budget to protect state-legalized medical marijuana industries and the patients they serve. The amendment prevented the DEA from spending a single penny on enforcing cannabis prohibition in those states. It didn’t overturn federal cannabis prohibition or legalize medical marijuana, but it did tie the Department of Justice’s hands by freezing their finances.
At the time, medical marijuana was legal in 21 states, a number that has grown to 30 since then. But they could all be shuttered soon because that amendment — which has to be renewed with every budget — was rejected yesterday by the House Rules Committee. That means the House can’t include the rider in their final version of the federal budget.
If the budget passes without that rider, budtenders, dispensary owners, doctors recommending cannabis and even medical marijuana patients could face prosecution for their involvement in the industry. And not just for what they’re doing right now. They could be charged with offences dating back to when they got involved in the state’s cannabis industry.
And Attorney General Sessions might do just that since he’s been itching to crackdown on those states. Since taking office, Sessions has ramped up anti-marijuana rhetoric in America. And last May, he asked Congress to drop the amendment so that he could unleash the DEA on medical marijuana states if he saw fit. His request was denied in July by the Senate Appropriations Committee, but it seems like his message resonated in the House.
The fight for the marijuana amendment isn’t over yet though. The budget has yet to reach the Senate, where the rider could be re-inserted with support from Senators Cory Booker (D – NJ), Mike Lee (R – UT), Lisa Murkowski (R – AK), Rand Paul (R – KY), Bernie Sanders (D – VT) and others.
But even if it does get reinserted and passed, the amendment only buys patients, doctors and businesses a small window of relief before they have to start looking over their shoulders for DEA helicopters again. The reality is that the industry won’t be safe until Congress listens to the 94 percent of Americans who support medical marijuana and changes the country’s criminally outdated cannabis laws.
###
The House Just Stripped Medical Marijuana States Of Protection From The DEA By James McClure
This past week I paid a visit to the State of Colorado to check out their booming cannabis industry. I wanted to see for myself how they operate and if that model could work in a place like Wisconsin.
Upon arriving in Colorado, the first question I asked was “where can I find a dispensary?” I was surprised by how freely people responded to that question. Everyone I asked about cannabis responded with absolute enthusiasm. I was truly in a place where people like us are not looked down upon and it was refreshing to say the least.
As I traveled around I noticed a lot of different dispensaries. Some were medical only, some were recreational only and others were a combination of both. Certain cities allowed only medical dispensaries while others allowed both types. Even in Colorado there appears to be cities and towns that do not fully embrace the cannabis industry, whether its legal statewide or not. I did not however come across any places where cannabis was prohibited all together. Regardless of what types of cannabis were sold in each locality, possession laws remained untouched. You could still possess recreational cannabis in a place allowing only the sale of medical. That seemed to be the only constant from location to location.
At the dispensaries I visited the security was tight and there were protocols that must be followed. When you first walk in the door you enter into a small waiting room where security is located. These rooms are completely empty with the exception of a few pieces of furniture and some decoration. You must show your ID which is scanned to make sure it is valid and not a forgery. Once that is complete you are asked to wait until a bud tender becomes available. When a bud tender becomes available they call you into the actual dispensary, where they once again look at your ID and match it with the one presented during your security check. Once that is complete you can begin your shopping.
Bud tenders were very helpful, especially to those who are visiting from out of state. They give you the complete rundown on how everything works and what you may or may not legally do. The laws states that you can purchase one ounce per transaction. However most dispensaries limit you to one ounce per day. The only product that actual weight applies to is flower. In Colorado 8 grams of concentrates or edibles containing 800mg equal the THC content of one ounce of flower and is maximum of those products you can purchase in a single day. You may mix and match products as long as the weight or THC equivalent equals an ounce or less. However possession laws are based solely on weight and not THC equivalence. Possession limits are one ounce per adult 21 and over.
All of the dispensaries were run professionally. They were clean and well managed. They were very comfortable and enjoyable to spend time in. They aren’t anything like some of the nay sayers might assume. Definitely nothing like our legislature assumes they would be. They were located in decent areas. They were safe and there is no way a minor is getting beyond the front door. The businesses were law abiding and so were the customers. There was nothing seedy or unsightly about dispensaries. They were in no way a negative presence in the business landscape.
The biggest problem that I had encountered was pretty much exclusive to visitors. Where can you consume the products you’ve just purchased? That is where Colorado really fell flat in the whole experience. You cannot consume in public. If you don’t know anyone who lives there where does that leave you? I asked around and no one could give me any good advice. Most hotels forbid smoking or vaping of any kind so you that would limit you to edibles. There are a handful of smoking lounges and private smoking clubs operating under a newly created law but because the territory is rather unexplored, the police mess with them quite often and therefore not a place to be while you are on vacation. This is the one shining problem with the entire process. Something we need to be aware of when legality happens in Wisconsin.
I do believe a similar industry could thrive here in Wisconsin. I don’t believe it would negatively affect any local businesses regardless of their services or products. The amount of jobs legalization can create is staggering. Combined with the amount of money these businesses generate legalization would be a definite boon to our economy. One Colorado medical dispensary owner had told me that he believed recreational sales at dispensaries located in touristy areas were in the ballpark of $90,000 per week. Can you imagine how much money a single recreational dispensary located in Wisconsin Dells could generate in a season? There is already a lot of money moving around Wisconsin because of cannabis. This would take this money and bring it out in the open where it will benefit everyone. I don’t see a downside. I can’t understand why our legislature is fighting so hard to keep something so positive away from its constituents.
Jessica read the minutes from last meeting and they were approved.
Rich read the treasurer’s report provided by Jay, who is unable to attend. He provided Jessica with a copy of the treasurer’s report.
Rich suggested that for those who are farther away, they could host a hangout at their house or other location, and invite some friends over to join the meeting online
Rich read the Madison Harvest Fest report. We set up a 10×20 tent at Harvest Fest on Oct. 6-7 and we were able to have room for all of the NORML chapters under one tent. The Texas NORML / Chronic Candy guy is going to send us some stuff also. We gave him a Northern WI NORML shirt. We were also given some hemp materials that will be displayed at our Answers to Energy Expo booth.
Unfinished business: there were new memberships gathered at harvest fest, but we really need people to become more active. We need people to put on presentations, we need board members, we need people to take initiatives on projects and help us with field activism.
Fundraising ideas: Rich displayed books, hemp products and other information at Harvest Fest. Several people wanted to purchase the books but they are for display only. He encouraged those people to ask their library to order the books to get them into the system. He also discussed possibly having a few books on hand to sell for events.
Change for Change: rich is going to make boxes unless someone has a better idea.
New Business:
October is breast cancer awareness month. Breasticle/Testicle Festival in Oshkosh on Wed Oct 24 from 6-8pm at Albee Hall at UWO. Rich thinks that we should go and hand out materials regarding cannabis and cancer. Phoenix Tears, etc.
Oct. 31 is halloween – why not carve a NORML or cannabis themed pumpkin and take a picture and upload it to facebook. Tag Northern WI NORML and Kottonmouth Kings in your pumpkin pics!
Haunted House: we may do a group field trip to a haunted house: if you can get a group of 25 together, there is a 25% discount. There is also a discount if you can get at least 8 together. Nox is the person to discuss this with.
The Cash Hyde foundation has requested help. Any donations would be appreciated. www.cashhydefoundation.com
Hemp Awareness Month is coming up in March – ideas, suggestions, etc are welcome.
Handout material creation – if you are good at creating graphics and other presentation materials, please contact Rich. We need assistance with creating some professional looking materials.
other news: large cannabis grow discovered in Chicago by police helicopters in Pembroke Township. $7M – 2 men charged.
We discussed that for upcoming events such as the answers to energy expo, we need volunteers and supporters to show up in very nice looking clothes. No tie dye, pot necklaces, etc. It’s a completely different crowd and we need to take a different approach.
Rich adjourned the meeting at 6:10pm. Nox seconded that. The meeting was adjourned.
Waushara Argus Newspaper, Inc. Wednesday September 8th 2010. www.wausharaargus.com
The article printed gave the headline Republican Candidates for Wisconsin Assembly District 41. On August 20th, 2010 I received the questions for this article and replied via email. The Democratic challenger, Scott Milheiser was not mentioned in the article and we are not sure why I was labeled as Republican. Perhaps all this talk about hemp and cannabis is even starting to sway rural print media, which could also benefit from industrial hemp as Selthofner’s campaign has pointed out.
Joan Ballweg went onto defeat fellow Republican and rural Markesan resident Nicholas Quade. Quade’s answers were also listed in the news article. The analysis of the primary numbers came early and Scott Mundro of the Berlin Journal Newspapers was the first to break the local story on September 16th . The story entitled Ballweg takes 41st District primary contained the following report, “While Quade will not be the Republican selection come November, with over a quarter of the GOP’s votes in Tuesday’s primary it can certainly be said that there is no unanimous favorite for the 41st District Assembly seat.”
The following are the answers to Candidate Questions provided by Jay Selthofner, Independent Candidate for Wisconsin State Assembly District 41.
I am married for 10 years and the father of three. I managed a successful insurance and investment practice for almost a decade. By asking questions and listening to my potential clients, we identified areas of importance, set goals and systemically worked together to achieve these goals. By constant communication, continuing education and networking with clients who had specific areas of expertise, we efficiently solved problems everyday. The State Assembly position requires being the vital link back and forth between the district and legislation process. I have shown over the past year I have skills to organize, educate, engage, encourage and passion to bring the people back to politics. With an efficient line of communication, introducing legislation and voting based on the ‘will of the people’ will be the standard operating procedure.
1. Rather than promote, we first should look at areas where the state government actually prohibits or discourages economic progress. By examining areas of law that impede economic growth, we can ultimately save taxpayers and business dollars while promoting economic progress efficiently. Industry incentives usually means subsidized by taxpayer dollars, just as producing and retaining college graduates does. Legalization of marijuana, in particular industrial hemp, will require the state of Wisconsin to look hard at rules and laws that directly prohibit economic progress and ultimately affect the retention of college graduates in our state.
2. We first have to put Wisconsin on the map, separating the state from the rest of the country. High property taxes and high fees are not attractive on a state resume already behind in most sectors. My proposal would be to create a new economy and tax base to draw from all together. Legalization of industrial hemp, medical marijuana and recreational cannabis could provide the economic boost needed in a variety of sectors, regulations would impose fees that are not even in existence today, healthcare costs could be dramatically lowered, and an ongoing sales tax could be attached to the purchase of marijuana. To assure taxpayers directly benefit from this change, legislation directing the revenue and protecting the taxpayer will need to be included.
3. In my proposal to legalize marijuana, I would propose that the “tax” breakdown include several specifically funded, under funded, or taxpayer funded areas, including the public school system. With the projected revenue increases, we will need to re-examine school funding and revenue limits. In general, I see areas where we can allow schools to be more efficient, but we cannot afford to under fund our children’s education.
4. Higher education opportunities funded by the State should increase as our state prospers. Unfortunately, our state is not prospering. The legalization of marijuana will lead to increased revenues, which undoubtedly will change the Wisconsin tax landscape. In general, I believe we need to encourage our youth to pursue higher education.
5. Infrastructure and our road ways can make or break communities, especially in rural Wisconsin. I would support increasing our funding and efficiency for transportation sectors and roadways. This support needs to be funded. The marijuana tax revenue can be directed both locally and to the state. The State may specifically direct a percentage of their portion of this tax towards the transportation fund.
6. It is well known that the healthcare industry in general is flawed. By allowing medical marijuana, health care costs will go down. Providing an alternative to recreational drugs such as alcohol, tobacco and prescriptions could improve the general health of the state’s residents, thus lowering overall healthcare costs. Healthcare costs should also be examined in this equation. I firmly believe every employer with morals and money would provide as many benefits to their employees as possible, including healthcare coverage. Public or private sector funding of a flawed system is not sustainable.
MADISON– Representative Melissa Sargent (D-Madison) released the following statement in support of the passage of AB-206 during today’s Assembly Floor Session:
“Wisconsin has the opportunity to be the hemp and cannabis hub of the Midwest, as demonstrated by the booming and successful hemp industry that has already begun in our state thanks to the Wisconsin Hemp Pilot Research Program. With Wisconsin’s rich farming heritage, in addition to its innovative entrepreneurs and business owners, Wisconsin has a long history of getting things done and being a pioneering leader for our nation.
Historically, hemp production in Wisconsin has been a crucial part of our collective identity and brought unprecedented economic stability to our diverse communities. After years of mindless federal prohibition, hemp is once again becoming a vital aspect of our growing state. From personal care products to sustainable alternatives to single-use plastics, Wisconsin is starting a new chapter in our states development-one that relies on hemp production.
The stunning positive impact of hemp production in our state proves that Wisconsin is the perfect site for full cannabis legalization. With Wisconsin’s strong agricultural roots and hardworking mindset, our state has the landscape and dedicated labor force to be the forefront of cannabis innovation and production. Fortunately, today, the Wisconsin State Assembly voted for the passage of AB-206, a bipartisan bill to update and address some of the obstacles being faced in the hemp industry. This legislation is an important step in assisting our state’s farmers and workers and moving the cannabis industry forward.
The fact of the matter is, that the legislation I have introduced to fully legalize cannabis in Wisconsin– AB 220– will bring a vastly profitable sector for our agricultural capabilities and producers, and will only further the remarkable successes our state has seen within the hemp program.
The future of Wisconsin agriculture rests on our state’s cannabis production, and I am proud to be a co-sponsor on AB-206 to further address the obstacles the hardworking farmers and entrepreneurs are facing. Cannabis is bringing, and will continue to bring, many opportunities to our state, and I look forward to Wisconsin taking further steps to legalize opportunity in our state.”
###
Melissa Sargent is a State Representative in the Wisconsin Assembly, representing the 48th Assembly District, which covers the east and north sides of the city of Madison and the village of Maple Bluff. Source
Wood County Spring Marijuana Referendum on April 2, 2019.
Wood County residents can voice their opinions this spring on medical and recreational marijuana use.
The referendums will ask:
“Should marijuana be legal for medical purposes only and available only by prescription through medical dispensary?”
“Should marijuana be legal for adults, 21 years of age and older, for recreational and medical use, which will be taxed and regulated like alcohol?”
VOTE YES April 2nd!
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.